Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1629063
 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



Lessons Learned from the Evolution of 'Evolving Standards'


Corinna Lain


University of Richmond - School of Law

February 18, 2010

Charleston Law Review, Vol. 4, p. 661, 2010

Abstract:     
This symposium contribution traces the evolution of the "evolving standards of decency" doctrine to question the textual defense of the doctrine and the constraining power of law itself. The cases that paved the way to "evolving standards" as a measure of substantive Eighth Amendment protection show the Justices time and again rejecting the result that a cold reading of the law would provide in favor of what they thought was right. In turn, what they thought was right has tended to change with the sensibilities of the time. Herein lies the rub. We can get rid of the "evolving standards" doctrine, but decisions that follow our evolving standards of proper punishment practices are here to stay.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: death penalty, Eighth Amendment, Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 24, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Lain, Corinna, Lessons Learned from the Evolution of 'Evolving Standards' (February 18, 2010). Charleston Law Review, Vol. 4, p. 661, 2010 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1629063

Contact Information

Corinna Lain (Contact Author)
University of Richmond - School of Law ( email )
28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 423
Downloads: 80
Download Rank: 184,179
Footnotes:  80

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.266 seconds