Then and Now: Professor Berle and the Unpredictable Shareholder
Jennifer G. Hill
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); NYU Law School, Hauser Global Fellows Program
June 28, 2010
Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1005-1023, 2010
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 10/58
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 10-17
ECGI - Law Working Paper No. 163/2010
This article is published in a special symposium edition on the work of Adolf Berle, which includes papers from a conference, In Berle’s Footsteps, held in November 2009 to celebrate the launch of the Adolf A. Berle, Jr. Center on Corporations, Law and Society.
Shareholders, and the relationship between shareholders and management, lay at the heart of Professor Berle’s scholarship. The goal of this Article is to compare the image of shareholders emerging from The Modern Corporation and Private Property and the Berle/Dodd debate with a range of contemporary visions of the shareholder that underpin some international regulatory responses to recent financial debacles, from Enron to the current global financial crisis. As the Article discusses, these recent developments in the era of financial crises, including the US shareholder empowerment debate, have prompted a re-evaluation of the traditional image of the shareholder and the role of the shareholder in the modern corporation that emerged in Professor Berle’s work.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle-Dodd debate, shareholder protection, shareholder empowerment, shareholder primacy, corporate governance, corporate theory, Enron, corporate scandals, global financial crisis, executive remuneration
JEL Classification: D70, G01, G30, G32, G34, G38, K20, K22, K33, N20, M14
Date posted: July 7, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds