Footnotes (29)



Presence and Absence in Lochner: Making Rights Real

Eileen A. Scallen

UCLA School of Law


Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 23, 1996

The judicial branch, specifically the United States Supreme Court, continually engages in a dance between a desire for stability and a perceived need for change, between what the law “is” and what the law “ought to be.” The Court’s decision to balance governmental justifications against individual liberty interests in deciding constitutionality is the selection of an argumentative strategy, one which causes rhetorical problems for the Court. How does one “measure” various rights or interests and “weigh” them against each other? This Essay uses the majority opinion in Lochner v. New York, one of the Court’s most infamous attempts to balance the will of the majority against individual liberty interests, to illustrate the problems resulting from the Court’s decision to balance rights and governmental interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Constitutional law, liberty, The United States Supreme Court, Lochner v. New York, judicial activism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 1, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Scallen, Eileen A., Presence and Absence in Lochner: Making Rights Real (1996). Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 23, 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1632473

Contact Information

Eileen A. Scallen (Contact Author)
UCLA School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
(310) 206-0592 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 278
Downloads: 14
Footnotes:  29

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds