Measuring Securities Litigation Risk
Irene Y. Kim
George Washington University
Douglas J. Skinner
The University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
September 1, 2011
Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 10-23
Journal of Accounting & Economics (JAE), Forthcoming
Extant research commonly uses indicator variables for industry membership to proxy for securities litigation risk. We provide evidence on the construct validity of this measure by reporting on the predictive ability of alternative models of litigation risk. While the industry measure alone does a relatively poor job of predicting litigation, supplementing this variable with measures of firm characteristics (such as size, growth, and stock volatility) considerably improves predictive ability. Additional variables such as those that proxy for corporate governance quality and managerial opportunism do not add much to predictive ability and so do not meet the cost-benefit test for inclusion.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 59
Keywords: Litigation risk, Securities litigation, Corporate disclosure
JEL Classification: K22, K41, M41
Date posted: July 1, 2010 ; Last revised: December 29, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.016 seconds