The Role of Evidence in the Value of Plea Bargains
Allison D. Redlich
State University of New York (SUNY) - School of Criminal Justice
Shawn D. Bushway
University at Albany
June 30, 2010
5th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper
It has been well established that a “plea discount” or “trial penalty” exists, such that defendants who plead guilty receive significant sentencing discounts relative to what they would receive if convicted at trial. Theorists argue that the exact value of this plea discount is determined by bargaining “in the shadow of a trial,” meaning that plea decision-making is premised on the perceived probable outcome of a trial. In trials, the strength of the evidence against defendants greatly impacts the probability of conviction. In the present study, we estimate the probability of conviction at the individual level for those who pleaded guilty. We find that, contrary to the rational choice model, evidentiary factors either do not impact or negatively impact the probability of conviction, which stands in stark contrast to the impact evidence has at trials. These preliminary findings suggest that plea bargain decision-making does not occur in the shadow of the trial.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: Courts, Plea Bargain, Prosecutors
JEL Classification: K42
Date posted: June 30, 2010 ; Last revised: August 16, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds