|
||||
|
||||
Dismissal with Prejudice? Race and Politics in Personal BankruptcySumit AgarwalNational University of Singapore Souphala ChomsisengphetGovernment of the United States of America - Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Robert McMenaminFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago - Economic Research Paige Marta SkibaVanderbilt Law School June 30, 2010 5th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper Abstract: We exploit the random assignment of judges in personal bankruptcy proceedings to test whether race and politics bias judges granting debt discharges in chapter 13 (reorganization) and chapter 7 (liquidation) bankruptcy proceedings. To do so, we have collected a random sample of 9,526 bankruptcy petitions. As race is not reported on court documents directly, we use information on name and zip code to calculate a Bayesian-likelihood estimate of individual debtors' race. Controlling for debtors' demographics and financial situation, results show that white judges are 21% more likely to dismiss the chapter 13 petition of an African American debtor relative to a white debtor. In chapter 13, judges have the most discretion and debtors actually appear in front of the judge at a confirmation hearing. We do not find significant effects for chapter 7 cases. Bankruptcy judges who were appointed by a Republican president are less debtor-friendly than those appointed by a Democrat.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41 Keywords: Personal Bankruptcy, Household Finance, Judges, Discrimination, Law and Economics JEL Classification: J71, K35, D12 working papers seriesDate posted: July 1, 2010 ; Last revised: November 8, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.437 seconds