The Informativeness of FIN 48 ‘Look-Forward’ Disclosures
Amy E. Dunbar
University of Connecticut - Department of Accounting
Thomas C. Omer
Texas A&M University (TAMU) - Department of Accounting
Thomas D. Schultz
Western Michigan University
May 1, 2010
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) requires firms to disclose a forecast of significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits (UTBs) that are reasonably possible to occur within 12 months of the reporting date. According to paragraph 21(d), the “look-forward” disclosure, a firm must disclose either an estimate of the range of the change or state that an estimate cannot be made. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, the willingness of firms to provide a meaningful estimate was debated because of the potential use of the information by tax authorities. We compare firms’ predictions of expected UTB changes to their subsequently reported changes and find that firms with relatively low cash effective tax rates or involved in a tax dispute are more likely to provide a disclosure that states that a change is possible, but no forecast of the change is provided. This evidence is consistent with firms being reluctant to disclose expected reserve releases related to audit settlements or impending statute lapses. On the other hand, for those firms that do provide a forecast, our forecast accuracy analysis reveals significant understatement and overstatement errors, which suggests task difficulty rather than strategic understatement of the anticipated changes in tax reserves.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: unrecognized tax benefits, tax contingency reserve, FIN 48, look-forward disclosure
JEL Classification: M41, M48working papers series
Date posted: July 3, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.298 seconds