Abstract

 
 

References (55)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Volatility Clustering through Different Perceived Business Cycle's Lengths


Daniel Andrei


UCLA Anderson

Michael Hasler


Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; Swiss Finance Institute

October 5, 2011


Abstract:     
We consider a pure exchange economy populated by 2 agents who filter out the unobservable fundamental. Agents incur different beliefs, because they disagree on the length of the business cycle. We explain both the level and the dynamics of the stock market volatility in close connection with the state of the economy. The stock market volatility is countercyclical and significantly higher than the consumption volatility. We highlight the endogenous mechanism that generates our results: A persistent fundamental, along with distinct perceptions of the length of the business cycle, implies a persistent disagreement among agents. Then, the disagreement affects the diffusion of the state price density and consequently the market volatility through the diffusion of the sentiment variable. Thanks to Malliavin calculus, we show that the disagreement process is the sole driver of the market volatility dynamics.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 3, 2010 ; Last revised: October 5, 2011

Suggested Citation

Andrei, Daniel and Hasler, Michael, Volatility Clustering through Different Perceived Business Cycle's Lengths (October 5, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1633885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1633885

Contact Information

Daniel Andrei (Contact Author)
UCLA Anderson ( email )
110 Westwood Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1481
United States
Michael Hasler
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne ( email )
Odyssea
Station 5
Lausanne, 1015
Switzerland
Swiss Finance Institute ( email )
c/o University of Geneve
40, Bd du Pont-d'Arve
1211 Geneva, CH-6900
Switzerland
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 588
Downloads: 98
Download Rank: 137,192
References:  55
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.813 seconds