Footnotes (205)



California Women: Trying to Use Federal Taxes to Put the 'Community' in Community Property

Stephanie Hunter McMahon

University of Cincinnati - College of Law

July 2, 2010

Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, Forthcoming

Community property is thought to be a more equitable marital property regime than the common law because we assume that providing each spouse with an interest in fifty percent of the family’s income also provides a substantial amount of equality between spouses. Historically, however, as the regime operated in the United States, it was not especially favorable to wives. Although the concept implied a partnership between spouses, in practice wives were denied rights a partner would expect to enjoy. This article examines how women lobbied to enlarge the protection California wives enjoyed under the state’s community property regime in the early twentieth century. Women adopted a strategy that does not conform to Progressive Era stereotypes. Women’s groups argued that couples would receive a federal income tax reduction if the state’s property system gave more rights to wives. Women’s use of these anti-tax arguments helped further their goals of equalizing spouses’ rights and obligations until the tacit political alliance of women and wealthy taxpayers unwound.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: community property, California, federalism, income tax, progressive era, tax reform, women's movement

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 3, 2010  

Suggested Citation

McMahon, Stephanie Hunter, California Women: Trying to Use Federal Taxes to Put the 'Community' in Community Property (July 2, 2010). Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1634028

Contact Information

Stephanie Hunter McMahon (Contact Author)
University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
513-556-4206 (Phone)
513-556-1236 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 822
Downloads: 64
Download Rank: 262,439
Footnotes:  205

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.265 seconds