Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1634126
 
 

Footnotes (128)



 


 



Estimating the Economic Impact of Mass Digitization Projects on Copyright Holders: Evidence from the Google Book Search Litigation


Hannibal Travis


Florida International University College of Law

July 1, 2010

Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, Vol. 57, 2010
Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 41-62

Abstract:     
Google Book Search (GBS) has captured the attention of many commentators and government officials, but even as they vigorously debate its legality, few of them have marshaled new facts to estimate its likely effects on publishing and other information markets. This Article challenges the conventional wisdom propounded by the U.S. and German governments, as well as Microsoft and other competitors of Google, concerning the likely economic impact of mass book-digitization projects. Originally advanced by publishing industry lobbying groups, the prevailing account of mass book-digitization projects is that they will devastate authors and publishers, just as Napster and its heirs have supposedly devastated musicians and music labels. Using the impact of GBS on the revenues and operating incomes of U.S. publishers believing themselves to be the most-affected by it, this Article finds no evidence of a negative impact upon them. To the contrary, it provides some evidence of a positive impact, and proposes further empirical research to identify the mechanisms of digitization’s economic impact.

The debate surrounding the GBS settlement is important to students, writers, researchers, and the general public, as it may decide whether a federal appellate court or even the U.S. Supreme Court allows the best research tool ever designed to survive. If the theory of Microsoft and some publishing trade associations is accepted, the courts may enjoin and destroy GBS, just as Napster was shut down a decade ago.

The Article aims at a preliminary estimate of the economic impact of mass digitization projects, using GBS as a case in point. It finds little support for the much-discussed hypothesis of the Association of American Publishers and Google’s competitors that the mass digitization of major U.S. libraries will reduce the revenues and profits of the most-affected publishers. In fact, the revenues and profits of the publishers who believe themselves to be most aggrieved by GBS, as measured by their willingness to file suit against Google for copyright infringement, increased at a faster rate after the project began, as compared to before its commencement. The rate of growth by publishers most affected by GBS is greater than the growth of the overall U.S. economy or of retail sales. Thus, the very publishers that have sued Google have seen their revenues grow faster than retail sales or the U.S. economy as a whole (measured by gross domestic product). This finding parallels some of the research that has been done since the Napster case on the economic impact of peer-to-peer file sharing on sales of recorded music. Future studies may provide a more granular estimate of the economic impact of frequent downloads or displays of pages of particular books on the sales of such books.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Google, Copyright, Damages, Fair Use, Economics, Publishers, Book, Book Industry, Sales, Profits, Napster, Google Book Search Copyright Litigation, Google Book Search Class Action, Google Book Search Copyright Settlement

JEL Classification: K00, K21

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 5, 2010 ; Last revised: October 28, 2012

Suggested Citation

Travis, Hannibal, Estimating the Economic Impact of Mass Digitization Projects on Copyright Holders: Evidence from the Google Book Search Litigation (July 1, 2010). Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, Vol. 57, 2010; Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 41-62. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1634126

Contact Information

Hannibal Travis (Contact Author)
Florida International University College of Law ( email )
11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 9,035
Downloads: 896
Download Rank: 13,693
Footnotes:  128
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-Works Monopoly?
By Randal Picker

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds