Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=163588
 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Team Production in Venture Capital Investing


D. Gordon Smith


Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School


Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 24, No. 4, Summer 1999

Abstract:     
Entrepreneurs and venture capitalists engage in "team production." Inherent in team production is an incentive problem: team members have an incentive to shirk. The incentive to shirk derives from the inability to monitor team members perfectly and compensate them based on productivity. Economic models of team production teach that solutions to shirking must involve (1) a principal (2) with authority to "break the budget" by realigning the claims of team members through use of a penalty or a bonding arrangement (3) based only on observations of team output, not on monitoring of individual inputs.

This paper analyzes the team production problem in venture capital investing using the rich set of facts provided by the book Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure, which recounts how entrepreneur Jerry Kaplan and his venture capitalists at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the most prominent venture capital firm in Silicon Valley, formed and operated GO Corporation. The paper argues that entrepreneurs and venture capitalists address the team production problem through staged financing, the practice of investing only enough money to allow the entrepreneur to progress to the next milestone in its business plan. Under the traditional view, the possibility of abandonment by the venture capitalist is the key virtue of staged financing. This insight is important but incomplete because it fails to accord full credit to the power of staged financing to provide incentives to both the entrepreneur and the venture capitalist. From the entrepreneur's perspective, the prospect of abandonment is not the only danger in staged financing, and it may not even be the most important. Another danger is that successive rounds of financing may substantially dilute the entrepreneur's interest in the company. This threat of dilution provides the entrepreneur with incentives to be diligent, thus effectively addressing the team production problem. Unlike the entrepreneur, the venture capitalist is not susceptible to dilution because the venture capitalist has a fixed claim, enforced by the right of first refusal in all additional financings. Nevertheless, the venture capitalist has incentives to maximize valuation at each stage of the financing process. Those incentives derive primarily from the reputational effects of high valuations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

JEL Classification: D23, G31, G32, G34

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 6, 1999  

Suggested Citation

Smith, D. Gordon, Team Production in Venture Capital Investing. Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 24, No. 4, Summer 1999. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=163588 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.163588

Contact Information

Gordon Smith (Contact Author)
Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )
422 JRCB
Provo, UT 84602
United States
801.422.3233 (Phone)
801.422.0390 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,291
Downloads: 333
Download Rank: 49,636
Citations:  3
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds