Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=163630
 


 



The Jurisprudence of Willfulness: An Evolving Theory of Excusable Ignorance


Sharon L. Davies


Ohio State University College of Law


Duke Law Journal, Vol. 48, P. 341, 1998

Abstract:     
Ignorantia legis non excusat -- ignorance of the law does not excuse -- is a centuries-old criminal law maxim familiar to lawyer and layperson alike. Under the doctrine, an accused finds little protection in the claim "But I did not know the law," for all are presumed either to be familiar with the law's commands or to proceed in ignorance at their own peril. The ignorant must be punished, the maxim teaches, to achieve a better educated and more law-abiding populace and to avoid the easy-to-assert and difficult-to-dispute claim of ignorance that would otherwise flow to the lips of any person facing criminal punishment.

Despite this country's long-standing allegiance to the hoary maxim, over the last century, and in particular over the last decade, the courts have seriously eroded the ignorantia legis principle by frequently construing the mens rea term "willfully" to require proof of an accused's knowledge of the law. The erosive effect that these constructions have had on the ignorantia legis maxim is referred to in this Article as the "jurisprudence of willfulness." Professor Davies demonstrates that, contrary to the maxim, the number of federal criminal statutes that have been construed to impose such a heightened mens rea requirement is already quite large. The Article reveals that, if the courts continue to employ their current interpretive approach to the term "willfully," at least 160 additional federal statutes containing the term are at risk of similar treatment.

The author argues that contemporary constructions of the troublesome scienter term to impose a knowledge of the law element have been grounded on doubtful, unchallenged logic and have bequeathed a legacy of grave interpretive confusion. Professor Davies maintains that much of the "jurisprudence of willfulness" is inimical to congressional judgments and, therefore, violative of rule of law and separation of powers principles. The Article urges a return to the ignorantia legis principle in all cases in which a clear legislative intent to abandon the maxim when employing the term "willfully" is missing.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: June 21, 1999  

Suggested Citation

Davies, Sharon L., The Jurisprudence of Willfulness: An Evolving Theory of Excusable Ignorance. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 48, P. 341, 1998 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=163630

Contact Information

Sharon Lee Davies (Contact Author)
Ohio State University College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Room 308
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-688-3389 (Phone)
614-292-2035 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,456

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds