Abstract

 


 



Expert Testimony and Scientific Evidence


Lynn McLain


University of Baltimore - School of Law

October 16, 2003

University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper

Abstract:     
This 40-page paper was prepared as a handout at a presentation for the Maryland Judicial Institute, with the Honorable Paul Grimm as a co-presenter. Issues and questions addressed are as follows: When is Expert Testimony Appropriate? Necessary?; When is Opinion Testimony Permitted, Whether Expert or Lay?; Opinions in Out-of-Court Statements; Who Is, and Who May Testify as, an Expert?; May/Must the Expert Testify at Trial to the Factual Basis of His/Her Opinion?; Opinions on Ultimate Issues; Sufficient Basis for Expert Testimony: Generally, 5-401, 5-702, and 5-403; Scientific Evidence; Frye-Reed vs. Daubert/Kumho Tire: How Do They Work? Which is Better?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Expert Testimony, Evidence, Opinion Testimony, Opinions in Out-of-Court Statements, Scientific Evidence, Frye-Reed, Daubert/Kumho Tire, Lay Witnesses, Opinions on Ultimate Issues

JEL Classification: K19, K29, K39, K49

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2010 ; Last revised: July 13, 2010

Suggested Citation

McLain, Lynn, Expert Testimony and Scientific Evidence (October 16, 2003). University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1636346 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1636346

Contact Information

Lynn McLain (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 351
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 193,735

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.515 seconds