American and European Monopolization Law: A Doctrinal and Empirical Comparison
Keith N. Hylton
William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor, Boston University; Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
Indiana University - Kelley School of Business - Department of Business Economics & Public Policy
July 8, 2010
REGULATING INNOVATION: COMPETITION POLICY AND PATENT LAW UNDER UNCERTAINTY, Cambridge University Press, 2010
Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 10-18
This paper focuses on the differences between Article 82 and Section 2, reflecting largely on the American experience. We start with a discussion of the American experience and use that as a background from which to examine the European law on monopolies. American law is more conservative (less interventionist), reflecting the error cost analysis that is increasingly common in American courts. The second half of this paper provides an empirical comparison of the American and European regimes. Although a preliminary empirical examination suggests that the scope of a country’s monopolization law is inversely related to its degree of trade dependence, the actual relationship between trade dependence and the scope of monopolization law appears to be an inverted U.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35
Keywords: monopolization, Section 2, Article 82, empirical antitrust, international antitrust
JEL Classification: K00, K21, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 10, 2010 ; Last revised: May 13, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.656 seconds