Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1636444
 


 



More Equal than Others, the Burger Court and the Newly Arrived State Resident


Katheryn D. Katz


Albany Law School

1989

New Mexico Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 329, 1989
Albany Law School Research Paper

Abstract:     
The Burger court created the rule of singular treatment of the newly arrived state residents as part of its equality jurisprudence. Issues have frequently been brought to the Court where newcomers have been denied an equal share of a state’s resources because of their status as newcomers. The Burger Court provided newcomers with protection by invalidating legislative acts on the basis of the illegitimacy of their animating purpose rather than the classification’s irrationality.

This article explores the Court’s decisions in Zobel v. William, Hooper v. Bernalillo County Assessor, and Attorney General of New York v. Soto-Lopez in order to explain the Court’s reasoning. The Burger Court’s decisions were not breaking with precedent, but it did go beyond traditional protection of fundamental rights.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: Traditional Protection of Fundamental Rights

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 11, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Katz, Katheryn D., More Equal than Others, the Burger Court and the Newly Arrived State Resident (1989). New Mexico Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 329, 1989 ; Albany Law School Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1636444

Contact Information

Katheryn D. Katz (Contact Author)
Albany Law School ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 144
Downloads: 5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds