Abstract

 
 

References (20)



 


 



Optimal Antitrust Enforcement: Judicial Standard, Judicial Error and Deterrence Effect


Juwon Kwak


Georgetown University Law Center

September 20, 2010


Abstract:     
This article analyzes the optimal antitrust enforcement rule, and, in doing so, presentes a model that illuminates two important issues. First, it compares the per se legal and illegal judicial standards with the rule of reason judicial standard in light of information costs and general social welfare. Second, it seeks to derive the optimal judicial standard that minimizes the problems of under- and over-deterrence. These two issues are closely related because the benefit of additional information can only be measured by its deterrent effects. In this respect, this work is a synthesis of economic models from decision theory and public enforcement of law. Lastly, in addition to discussion of the optimal information level, we derive the optimal permissiveness of the judicial standard.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: Rule of Reason, Per Se Legal, Per Se Illegal, Decision Theory, Public Enforcement of Law

JEL Classification: K0, K2, K4, L4, L5

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 9, 2010 ; Last revised: September 23, 2010

Suggested Citation

Kwak, Juwon, Optimal Antitrust Enforcement: Judicial Standard, Judicial Error and Deterrence Effect (September 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1636523 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1636523

Contact Information

Juwon Kwak (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 280
Downloads: 78
Download Rank: 158,503
References:  20
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds