|
||||
|
||||
How Do Employers React to a Pay-or-Play Mandate? Early Evidence from San FranciscoCarrie CollaThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice William DowUniversity of California, Berkeley - School of Public Health Arindrajit DubeUniversity of California, Berkeley - Institute for Research on Labor and Employment July 2010 NBER Working Paper No. w16179 Abstract: In 2006 San Francisco adopted major health reform, becoming the first city to implement a pay-or-play employer health spending mandate. It also created Healthy San Francisco, a “public option” to promote affordable universal access to care. Using the 2008 Bay Area Employer Health Benefits Survey, we find that most employers (75%) had to increase health spending to comply with the law, yet most (64%) are supportive of the law. There is substantial employer demand for the public option, with 21% of firms using Healthy San Francisco for at least some employees, yet there is little evidence of firms dropping existing insurance offerings in the first year after implementation. Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38 working papers seriesDate posted: July 12, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds