Challenging Arbitrators and the Importance of Disclosure: Recent Cases and Reflections
University of London - School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) - School of Law
Croatian Arbitration Yearbook, Vol. 16, pp. 205-235, 2009
SOAS School of Law Research Paper No. 08-2010
The last few years have seen a rise in challenges to arbitrators. It is argued that challenges are a tactic resorted to by parties and their counsel to cause delay and increase the costs of arbitration and, thus, undermine the parties’ choice and the finality of awards. However, the right to challenge an arbitrator and the arbitrators’ duty of disclosure are key to ensuring the integrity of the arbitral process. This article examines how the balance is struck between these two objectives by looking at the nature and the scope of the right to challenge arbitrators and the duty to disclose under national laws and rules of arbitral institutions. After reviewing recent national court cases and arbitral decisions concerning challenge, the article calls for (i) the threshold for challenging arbitrators in investment arbitrations to be, at the very least, the same as in international commercial arbitrations; (ii) a neutral and independent body to be given the authority to review challenges under the ICSID system; and (ii) disclosure obligations to be imposed on counsel and the parties.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38
Keywords: Challenge of arbitrators, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, Croatian Arbitration Act, English Arbitration Act, Rules of Arbitration of the Permanent Arbitration Court attached to the Croatian Chamber of Economy, ICC Rules of Arbitration
Date posted: July 11, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds