The First Amendment's Protection of Expressive Activity in the University Classroom: A Constitutional Myth
Katheryn D. Katz
Albany Law School
UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 16 , p. 857, 1983
Albany Law School Research Paper
The term “academic freedom” creates the impression that university classrooms provide professors a higher order and greater quantum of first amendment protection than other workplaces. But that impression does not comport with reality. Current constitutional doctrine does not support any super protected status for classroom utterances. Instead, classroom speech enjoys less protection than ordinary speech. While the First Amendment has certainly crafted the contours of academic freedom, another concept is clearly at work as well: tenure.
This article argues that, beyond the protections of the First Amendment, lies the protection of tenure. That free speech will be protected for tenured faculty more so than for others. This article not only examines the issues of tenure, but other nonsubstantive considerations in First Amendment jurisprudence, such as state action. Indeed, it will be shown that the greatest protections for faculty lie in these “extraconstitutional” mechanisms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 76
Keywords: Academic Freedom, TenureAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 12, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds