Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1639051
 


 



Indigent Defense Invigorated: A Uniform Standard for Adjudicating Pre-Conviction Sixth Amendment Claims


Emily Chiang


S.J. Quinney College of Law


Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, p. 443, 2010

Abstract:     
Despite the Sixth Amendment guarantee of the right to counsel, commentators have been documenting the shortcomings of indigent defense systems across the nation for decades: state and county underfunding leads to public defenders without essential resources, which in turn results in harm to indigent criminal defendants. Although a host of litigation brought by would-be reformers has sought improvements in county and state public defense systems, many of the claims have suffered from a lack of a clear governing standard. Some courts have relied on the “cause and prejudice” requirements of Strickland v. Washington, which governs post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claims, to great ill effect. This Article contends that rather than resorting to Strickland, claimants and courts should look to allegations of constitutional injury, not prejudice, under other well-settled criminal and civil standards. Those bringing criminal cases should look to the wealth of Sixth Amendment caselaw defining an individual’s substantive right to counsel; and those bringing civil cases should look to the law governing requests for prospective injunctive relief, specifically the need to allege the serious likelihood of irreparable harm – with an eye to the types of harm recognized in the Sixth Amendment criminal cases defining and individual’s substantive right to counsel.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Sixth Amendment, Gideon, Strickland, Right to counsel, Ineffective assistance of counsel, pre-conviction

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 13, 2010 ; Last revised: February 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Chiang, Emily, Indigent Defense Invigorated: A Uniform Standard for Adjudicating Pre-Conviction Sixth Amendment Claims. Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, p. 443, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1639051

Contact Information

Emily Chiang (Contact Author)
S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States
801 585-5288 (Phone)
801 581-6897 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 228
Downloads: 44

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds