Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=163972
 
 

Citations (5)



 
 

Footnotes (94)



 


 



Taking Slippage Seriously: Noncompliance and Creative Compliance in Environmental Law


Daniel A. Farber


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law



Abstract:     
Legal scholars have focused their attention on regulatory standards. Less attention has been given to the inevitable "slippage" between the standards and the ensuing implementation. This essay presents an alternate view that highlights the slippage.

Part I discusses two forms of slippage. "Negative" slippage is a ubiquitous feature of environmental law: something that is legally mandated simply fails to happen. "Affirmative" slippage is more interesting: the required standards are renegotiated rather than ignored, resulting in a regulatory regime that may bear little resemblance to the "law on the books."

Part II explores how the concept of slippage might inform discussions of legal doctrine, environmental policy, and environmental pedagogy. It turns out that the Supreme Court has had a certain degree of complicity in the creation of slippage. Slippage also has implications for policy debates over environmental standards. If standards are not automatically translated into compliance, our understanding of their costs and benefits may shift. Finally, in terms of teaching, we need to devote more attention to compliance-related issues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 23, 1999  

Suggested Citation

Farber, Daniel A., Taking Slippage Seriously: Noncompliance and Creative Compliance in Environmental Law. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=163972 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.163972

Contact Information

Daniel A. Farber (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Room 894
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-642-0340 (Phone)
510-642-3728 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,450
Downloads: 239
Download Rank: 72,207
Citations:  5
Footnotes:  94

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds