Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1640681
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (68)



 


 



The Use of Legal Scholarship by the Federal Courts of Appeals: An Empirical Study


David L. Schwartz


Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law

Lee Petherbridge


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

August 17, 2010

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 96, p. 1345, 2011
5th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-38

Abstract:     
Chief Justice Roberts recently explained that he does not pay much attention to law review articles, reportedly stating that they are not “particularly helpful for practitioners and judges.” Chief Justice Roberts’s criticism echoes that made by other judges, some of whom, like Judge Harry Edwards, have been much more strident in the contention that legal scholarship is largely unhelpful to practitioners and judges. Perhaps inspired by criticisms like those leveled by Chief Justice Roberts and Judge Edwards, legal scholars have sought to investigate the relevance of legal scholarship to courts and practitioners using a variety of means. One avenue of investigation has been empirical, where several studies, using different, and sometimes ambiguous, methodologies have observed a decrease in citation to legal scholarship and interpreted the observation to mean that legal scholarship has lost relevance to courts and practitioners.

The study reported here examines the hypothesis that legal scholarship has lost relevance to courts. Using empirical techniques and an original dataset that is substantially more comprehensive than those used in previous studies, it examines citation to legal scholarship by the United States circuit courts of appeals over the last 59 years. It finds a rather surprising result. Contrary to the claims of Justice Roberts and Judge Edwards, and contrary to the results of prior studies, this study finds that over the last 59 years there has been a marked increase in the frequency of citation to legal scholarship in the reported opinions of the circuit courts of appeals. Using empirical and theoretical methods, this study also considers explanations for courts’ increased use of legal scholarship.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Law Reviews, Law and Courts, Judges, Circuit Courts, Legal Scholarship, Law Journals, Empirical, Law and Society

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2010 ; Last revised: August 21, 2012

Suggested Citation

Schwartz, David L. and Petherbridge, Lee, The Use of Legal Scholarship by the Federal Courts of Appeals: An Empirical Study (August 17, 2010). Cornell Law Review, Vol. 96, p. 1345, 2011; 5th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-38. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1640681

Contact Information

David L. Schwartz
Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )
565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661-3691
United States

Lee Petherbridge (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8194 (Phone)
213-380-3769 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,898
Downloads: 583
Download Rank: 24,727
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  68

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds