Uncertainty and the Advantage of Collective Settlement
Howard M. Erichson
Fordham University School of Law
DePaul Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2011
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1641390
This essay explores whether collective settlements offer advantages for achieving just outcomes in light of the various types of uncertainty that arise in mass disputes. Looking in particular at the example of product liability litigation, one can identify at least six areas of potential uncertainty: general causation, liability, exposure, product identification, individual causation, and damages. The essay analyzes each of these six types of uncertainty in terms of the relative advantages of individual adjudication, collective adjudication, individual settlement, and collective settlement. While collective settlement in any case offers the benefits of compromise and efficiency, the justice advantages of collective settlement are most pronounced in cases involving uncertainty regarding product identification, damages, and above all, individual causation. Among mass disputes involving uncertain individual causation, it is possible to identify those disputes that present the strongest opportunities for just outcomes through collective settlements.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15
Keywords: collective settlement, uncertainty, mass tort, aggregate settlement, class action, specific causation, indeterminate plaintiff, proportional liability
JEL Classification: K13, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 18, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds