Amplifying Silence: Uncertainty and Control Parables in Contemporary China
Rachel E. Stern
University of California, Berkeley - Department of Jurisprudence & Social Policy
University of Technology, Sydney (UTS) - Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Comparative Political Studies, October 2012, pp. 1230-1254.
Well-known tools of state coercion, like administrative punishment, imprisonment and violence, affect far less than 1% of Chinese journalists and lawyers. What, then, keeps the other 99% in line? Building on work detailing control strategies in illiberal states, we suggest that the answer is more complicated than the usual story of heavy-handed repression. Instead, deep-rooted uncertainty about the boundaries of permissible political action magnifies the effect of each crackdown. Unsure of the limits of state tolerance, lawyers and journalists frequently self-censor, effectively controlling themselves. But self-censorship does not always mean total retreat from political concerns. Rather, didactic stories about transgression help the politically-inclined map the grey zone between (relatively) safe and unacceptably risky choices. For all but the most optimistic risk takers, these stories - which we call control parables - harden limits on activism by illustrating a set of prescriptions designed to prevent future clashes with authority. The rules for daily behavior, in short, are not handed down from the pinnacle of the state, but jointly written (and re-written) by Chinese public professionals and their government overseers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: State-society relations, China, control, activism, journalists, lawyers, control parablesAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 30, 2012 ; Last revised: September 26, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds