Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1644734
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (101)



 


 



When a Monopolist Deceives


Maurice E. Stucke


University of Tennessee College of Law

July 17, 2010

Antitrust Law Journal , Vol. 76, No. 3, p. 823, 2010
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 118

Abstract:     
This essay uses one context - a monopolist’s deceptive advertising or product disparagement - to illustrate how competition authorities and courts should evaluate a monopolist’s deception under the federal antitrust laws. Competition authorities should target a monopolist’s anticompetitive deception, which courts should treat as a prima facie violation of the Sherman Act without requiring a full-blown rule of reason analysis or an arbitrary, multi-factor standard.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Antitrust, Monopoly, Deception, Fraud, Section 2

JEL Classification: K21, L41, L12

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 18, 2010 ; Last revised: September 2, 2010

Suggested Citation

Stucke, Maurice E., When a Monopolist Deceives (July 17, 2010). Antitrust Law Journal , Vol. 76, No. 3, p. 823, 2010; University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 118. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1644734

Contact Information

Maurice E. Stucke (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 W. Cumberland Ave.
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States
865-974-9816 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.utk.edu/people/maurice-e-stucke/

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,147
Downloads: 291
Download Rank: 58,332
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  101
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds