|
||||
|
||||
When a Monopolist DeceivesMaurice E. StuckeUniversity of Tennessee College of Law July 17, 2010 Antitrust Law Journal , Vol. 76, No. 3, p. 823, 2010 University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 118 Abstract: This essay uses one context - a monopolist’s deceptive advertising or product disparagement - to illustrate how competition authorities and courts should evaluate a monopolist’s deception under the federal antitrust laws. Competition authorities should target a monopolist’s anticompetitive deception, which courts should treat as a prima facie violation of the Sherman Act without requiring a full-blown rule of reason analysis or an arbitrary, multi-factor standard.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25 Keywords: Antitrust, Monopoly, Deception, Fraud, Section 2 JEL Classification: K21, L41, L12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 18, 2010 ; Last revised: September 2, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds