Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1645954
 


 



Just Say No: Birth Control in the Connecticut Supreme Court Before Griswold v. Connecticut


Mary L. Dudziak


Emory University School of Law; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences

July 20, 2010

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 75, 1990
USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 10-12

Abstract:     
This essay examines the right to use birth control in Connecticut before Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). It is often assumed that the Connecticut birth control ban was not enforced, and consequently did not affect access to birth control in the state. Accordingly, the cases challenging the state statute have been viewed as not real cases or controversies deserving of court attention. This essay demonstrates that this view is erroneous. Connecticut law was enforced against the personnel of birth control clinics for aiding and abetting the use of contraceptives. Enforcement of the statute against those working in clinics kept birth control clinics closed in Connecticut for twenty-five years. The lack of birth control clinics may not have greatly affected middle-class and wealthy people who could afford private medical care, since doctors would often ignore the laws. The lack of clinics primarily harmed lower-income women who needed the free or low-cost services birth control clinics provided. It was the impact of birth control restrictions on the poor that led Dr. C. Lee Buxton, along with Estelle Griswold, to publicly violate the law by opening the clinic that resulted in their arrests, and ultimately in the Supreme Court ruling in Griswold.

Beyond its importance to the history of reproductive rights, this essay illuminates the history of rights under state constitutional law. Until 1965, the United States Supreme Court largely avoided cases involving reproductive rights, with the notable exception of sterilization. Appeals to the Supreme Court in cases involving constitutional challenges to state restrictions on contraceptives were regularly dismissed for want of a substantial federal question or due to lack of standing, so that substantive rulings in birth control cases were confined to the state courts and, on questions of federal law, to the lower federal courts. Because the Supreme Court did not hear these cases, the right to use birth control was determined by state law until 1965, when the Court decided Griswold v. Connecticut. Consequently, an examination of this area of law enables us to see the independent treatment of constitutional rights by one state court without meaningful input from the U.S. Supreme Court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: birth control, reproductive rights, right to privacy, Griswold, Connecticut, history, legal history, state constitutional law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 21, 2010 ; Last revised: August 2, 2010

Suggested Citation

Dudziak, Mary L., Just Say No: Birth Control in the Connecticut Supreme Court Before Griswold v. Connecticut (July 20, 2010). Iowa Law Review, Vol. 75, 1990; USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 10-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1645954

Contact Information

Mary L. Dudziak (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences ( email )
75 Alta Rd
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,107
Downloads: 117
Download Rank: 145,063

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds