Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1646088
 


 



Some Thoughts on the Constitutionality of Good Samaritan Statutes


Barry Sullivan


Loyola University Chicago School of Law

1982

American Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 8, 1982

Abstract:     
Good Samaritan laws provide legal immunity to persons who assist in medical emergencies. Because good Samaritan laws eliminate the common law right of victims to secure redress for their injuries, these statutes raise certain constitutional questions.

This article begins by examining the vulnerability of good Samaritan statutes to federal constitutional attack on substantive due process and equal protection grounds. It then considers the susceptibility of such laws to state constitutional attack on the same grounds. The article concludes that while such statutes are not likely to violate federal substantive due process and equal protection provisions, they may be held unconstitutional on similar state grounds.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Good Samaritan laws, emergency medical care, constitutional law

JEL Classification: K10, K13, K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 22, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Sullivan, Barry, Some Thoughts on the Constitutionality of Good Samaritan Statutes (1982). American Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 8, 1982. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1646088

Contact Information

Barry Sullivan (Contact Author)
Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )
25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.luc.edu/law/faculty/sullivan.html

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 461
Downloads: 64
Download Rank: 209,163

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.296 seconds