Maurice E. Stucke
University of Tennessee College of Law
July 20, 2010
Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 81, p. 107, 2011
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 123
In light of the financial crisis and the empirical findings from behavioral economics, policymakers should reconsider the fundamental question: What is competition? Only in understanding competition can one understand what competition can or cannot achieve under certain circumstances.
This Article reexamines one premise of competition, namely the extent to which firms, consumers, and the government are rational and act with perfect willpower. In varying this assumption, the Article maps four scenarios of competition.
Competition authorities should revisit their conception of competition, including the underlying assumptions, to better understand the competitive dynamics in different industries. In engaging in this review, competition authorities should consider the developments in several inter-disciplinary fields, such as behavioral economics, new institutional economics, and evolutionary economics. The literature can provide competition authorities a richer understanding of observed behavior in the marketplace, how consumers choose, and additional remedial options, such as default options. Ultimately, these interdisciplinary economic theories can improve antitrust analysis by helping us understand first what competition is, second what competition can achieve for us, and finally how competition can promote the good life.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 82
Keywords: Competition, Antitrust, Sherman Act, Consumer Protection, Behavioral Economics
JEL Classification: D41, L40, L41, D18, D21Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 22, 2010 ; Last revised: January 17, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.688 seconds