Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1646544
 
 

Footnotes (305)



 


 



Skeptical Internationalism: A Study of Whether International Law is Law


Joshua Kleinfeld


Northwestern University - School of Law

April 1, 2010

78 Fordham Law Review 2451 (2010)
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 12-40

Abstract:     
This paper asks whether international law should be understood as a form of law at all. The analysis proceeds in three steps. First, the paper argues that no general or a priori answer to that question is desirable; one must engage with the jurisprudential questions in a contextualized way, asking at once how something comes to have the status of law and whether international law in particular instances of operation is such as to have that status. Second, the paper takes up the litigation connected to the Israeli/West Bank barrier, asking whether that case was or could have been addressed in such a way as to keep faith with minimal principles of legality. It wasn’t, the paper finds – but it could have been. Third, the paper specifies four values that are constitutive elements of the experience of law as law: that law have the capacity to give rise to events in the world (law’s efficacy); that it obligate as a matter of legitimate authority (law’s normativity); that it obligate as a matter of moral rationality (normativity again); and that it maintain a character distinct from the political or partisan (law’s objectivity). International law as seen in the Barrier case is then put to the test with respect to each of the four, and again the outcome is that nothing intrinsic to international law deprived it of the character of law, but that the courts and other institutions of the international system fell short of the law’s promise. The paper concludes by proposing a position it terms “skeptical internationalism” – a position that recognizes the ambivalence of international law in practical operation, affirming the legal status or potential of international law’s project and much of its doctrinal content, but reserving some skepticism for the ways in which that doctrinal content is interpreted and that project carried out.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 81

Keywords: International Law, Jurisprudence, Philosophy of Law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 22, 2010 ; Last revised: December 29, 2012

Suggested Citation

Kleinfeld, Joshua, Skeptical Internationalism: A Study of Whether International Law is Law (April 1, 2010). 78 Fordham Law Review 2451 (2010); Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 12-40. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1646544

Contact Information

Joshua Kleinfeld (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 909
Downloads: 200
Download Rank: 84,145
Footnotes:  305

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.485 seconds