Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=164668
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (241)



 


 



Managed Care, Autonomy, and Decision-Making at The
End-of-Life


Alan Meisel


University of Pittsburgh School of Law


University of Houston Law Review, Vol. 35, pp. 1393-1436, 1999
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series

Abstract:     
Some argue that legalizing physician-assisted suicide poses intolerable risks, especially as we move from a system of fee-for-service health care to managed care. Although we need to be concerned about physician-assisted suicide in the context of managed care, physician-assisted suicide poses risks in a fee-for-service system too. In addition, we need to be concerned about the risks posed not only by physician-assisted suicide but also by the well-accepted practice of forgoing life-sustaining treatment. Instead of focusing on the manner of hastening death or the type of health care system, we need to show more concern for protections to assure that no matter how terminally ill patients seek to hasten their deaths, if they do, and regardless of the type of health care system, that their decisions are genuine reflections of their own wishes. Of course, we need to design safeguards that are sensitive to the nature of the health care system and the particular kinds of problems that it might pose (such as managed care incentives), and we need to take into account any special problems posed by physician-assisted suicide in contrast to termination of life support, if there are any. There is only the weakest evidence, however, that we need to prevent the legalization of physician-assisted suicide simply because of the ascendance of managed care.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: physician-assisted suicide, legalization, actively hastening death, passively hastening death, palliative care, pain control

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 17, 1999 ; Last revised: June 26, 2008

Suggested Citation

Meisel, Alan, Managed Care, Autonomy, and Decision-Making at The End-of-Life. University of Houston Law Review, Vol. 35, pp. 1393-1436, 1999; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=164668

Contact Information

Alan Meisel (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-1384 (Phone)
412-648-2649 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 507
Downloads: 25
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  241

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds