Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1647007
 
 

Footnotes (486)



 


 



Access to Meaningful Remedy: Doctrinal Obstacles in Tort Litigation Against Domestic Violence Offenders


Sarah M. Buel


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

2004

Oregon Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 945, 2004

Abstract:     
Domestic violence victims may currently file tort actions against their abusers, couched as assault and battery, stalking, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and fraud,among others. Despite the fact that such remedies are desirable under legal and compensation frameworks, battered women have not generally used these options. Domestic violence victims have dramatically underutilized tort law, with at least three doctrinal obstacles thwarting its use: the courts’ reluctance to interfere in marriages, the assumption that existing laws adequately regulate divorce, and the primacy of statutes of limitation. Legal doctrine must be reformed to diminish the dangerous and unfair results experienced by too many abuse survivors who turn to the courts for help. After reviewing cultural norms and discussing the doctrinal obstacles, I argue for recognition of a new tort of domestic violence to afford abuse victims increased access to the panoply of remedies to which they are entitled. As an administratively feasible option, the tort of domestic violence reflects the same call for specialization as for medical malpractice, toxic torts, products liability, and mass torts. Recognizing a tort of domestic violence also provides a normative basis for reforming the doctrinal obstacles that needlessly interfere with the right of battered women to seek redress for their harms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 90

Keywords: domestic violence, torts, remedy

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 24, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Buel, Sarah M., Access to Meaningful Remedy: Doctrinal Obstacles in Tort Litigation Against Domestic Violence Offenders (2004). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 945, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1647007

Contact Information

Sarah M. Buel (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 579
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 174,741
Footnotes:  486

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds