Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1647211
 
 

Footnotes (84)



 


 



Explaining and Evaluating the UNMIK Court System


John Cerone


New England Law | Boston

Clive Baldwin


United Nations - United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK)

January 28, 2003


Abstract:     
This chapter describes the nature and composition of the Kosovo court system, providing an overview of the legal framework within which it operates and highlighting the features that make it unique. It also evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of this form of internationalized court, both in design and execution, focusing primarily on the effectiveness of introducing international judges and prosecutors into the system.

Assuming the relevant criteria are legal basis, personnel composition, subject matter jurisdiction, and function, the Kosovo courts in which international judges sit may properly be considered hybrid or internationalized courts. The legal basis of these courts may be found in UNMIK Regulations qua domestic legislation; however, the authority of these Regulations is derived from UN Security Council Resolution 1244, an international legal instrument. The courts are staffed by a mix of Kosovan and international officials and apply both national and international law. While generally situated as domestic courts, they also perform a function peculiar to international courts – removing sensitive cases and those involving application of international norms from the exclusive province of domestic judges, who may lack the necessary objectivity and expertise.

Whether the system established in Kosovo can be deemed a success depends largely on the criteria used in conducting such an evaluation. Although international human rights law was made directly applicable, the courts lack the resources and the capacity necessary to apply it. The international judges have failed to increase that capacity in any meaningful way. While their participation has lent an air of neutrality in relation to the tensions among Kosovo’s different ethnic groups, the international judges have not achieved sufficient independence from the UNMIK executive.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Kosovo, UNMIK, UNMIK court system, hybrid courts, internationalized courts

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 23, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Cerone, John and Baldwin, Clive, Explaining and Evaluating the UNMIK Court System (January 28, 2003). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1647211 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1647211

Contact Information

John Cerone (Contact Author)
New England Law | Boston ( email )
154 Stuart St.
Boston, MA 02116
United States
617-422-7273 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nesl.edu/center

Clive Baldwin
United Nations - United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) ( email )
Kosovo
Republic of Serbia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 288
Downloads: 66
Download Rank: 195,262
Footnotes:  84

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.453 seconds