Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1647744
 
 

Footnotes (223)



 


 



Bridging the Accountability Gap: Rights for New Entities in the Information Society?


Bert-Jaap Koops


Tilburg University - Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT)

Mireille Hildebrandt


Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law; Vrije Universiteit Brussel

David-Olivier Jaquet-Chiffelle


Bern University of applied Sciences; University of Lausanne

July 23, 2010

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 497-561, 2010
Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 017/2010

Abstract:     
New entities in the information society that operate at increasing distance from the physical persons ‘behind’ them, such as pseudonyms, avatars, software agents, and robots, challenge the law. One way of addressing this challenge is to attribute legal rights and/or duties in some contexts to non-humans, thus creating entities that are addressable in law themselves rather than the persons ‘behind’ them. In this article, we review existing literature on rights for non-humans, with a particular focus on emerging entities in the information society. We discuss three strategies for the law to deal with the challenge of these new entities: interpreting and extending existing law, introducing limited legal personhood with strict liability, and granting full legal personhood. Full legal personhood implies that entities can be held liable for culpable and wrongful action and can claim (post) human rights like freedom of expression and the right to a fair trial. To assess these strategies, we distinguish between different types of persons (abstract, legal, and moral) and different types of agency (automatic, autonomic, and autonomous). We conclude that interpretation and extension of the law seems to work well enough with today’s emerging entities, but that sooner or later, attributing limited legal personhood with strict liability is probably a good solution to bridge the accountability gap for autonomic entities; for software agents, this may be sooner rather than later. The technology underlying new entities will, however, have to develop considerably further from facilitating autonomic to facilitating autonomous behavior, before it becomes legally relevant to attribute ‘posthuman’ rights to new entities.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: Software Agents, Robots, Agency, Personhood, Autonomy, Liability, Posthuman Rights

JEL Classification: K10, K13, K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 23, 2010 ; Last revised: November 2, 2010

Suggested Citation

Koops, Bert-Jaap and Hildebrandt, Mireille and Jaquet-Chiffelle, David-Olivier, Bridging the Accountability Gap: Rights for New Entities in the Information Society? (July 23, 2010). Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 497-561, 2010; Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 017/2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1647744

Contact Information

Bert-Jaap Koops (Contact Author)
Tilburg University - Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT) ( email )
P.O.Box 90153
Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 221
Tilburg, 5037
Netherlands
Mireille Hildebrandt
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law ( email )
3000 DR Rotterdam
Netherlands
Vrije Universiteit Brussel ( email )
Pleinlaan 2
Brussels, B-1050
Belgium
David-Olivier Jaquet-Chiffelle
Bern University of applied Sciences ( email )
Quellgasse 21
CP 1180
Biel/Bienne, 2501
Switzerland
+41 32 32 16 266 (Phone)
+41 32 32 16 500 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.vip.ch
University of Lausanne ( email )
Lausanne, 1015
Switzerland
HOME PAGE: http://www.vip.ch
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 810
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 160,927
Footnotes:  223

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds