|
||||
|
||||
Does Section 2(B) Really Make a Difference? Part 1: Freedom of Expression, Defamation Law, and the Journalist-Source PrivilegeJamie CameronYork University - Osgoode Hall Law School July 26, 2010 Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 28/2010 Abstract: The question this article poses is whether the common law must adopt Charter-specific doctrines or remedies when Charter values are at stake. The discussion focuses on the Supreme Court’s defamation decisions, but includes brief remarks about R. v. National Post, which considered whether the Wigmore test for a journalist-source privilege is consistent with the Charter.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30 Keywords: Freedom of expression, Defamation, Journalist, Source privilege, Wigmore test, Church of Scientology, WIC Radio, Grant v. Torstar Corp., Cusson v. Quan, Common law, Charter, Supreme Court of Canada, public interest responsible communication JEL Classification: K39 working papers seriesDate posted: July 26, 2010 ; Last revised: December 16, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.531 seconds