A Structural Critique of Trader Taxation
Tulane Law School
July 19, 2008
Florida Tax Review, Vol. 8, No. 10, p. 1113, 2008
This article scrutinizes the structural elements underlying the unusual tax treatment of securities traders under current law. After summarizing the distinguishing features of trader taxation, this article explains how the treatment of securities traders today has occurred due to a long-standing, legislatively created disjuncture at the point where the “to customers” requirement in the capital asset rules (i.e., the requirement that traders must sell “to customers” in order to escape capital asset classification and court findings that they do not) and the “trade or business” concept intersect. The article reviews some of the traditional critiques that have been levied against trader taxation, and develops some new structural criticisms grounded in contemporary exigencies. The article further argues that restrictive court interpretations of the “to customers” requirement and the legislative creation of an elective “mark-to-market” regime for securities traders in effect constitute a de facto repeal of (or, at the very least, a minimization of the impact of) the “to customers” requirement in the capital asset statute. This article concludes that the “to customers” requirement should be eliminated and a different approach should be taken toward taxing traders.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 31, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds