Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650021
 
 

Footnotes (121)



 


 



The Story of Ewing v. California: Three Strikes Laws and the Limits of the Eighth Amendment Proportionality Review


Sara Sun Beale


Duke University School of Law

July 28, 2010

CRIMINAL LAW STORIES, Donna Coker, Robert Weisberg, eds., Foundation Press, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In 1994 California enacted the nation's harshest three strikes law. Under this law, any felony can serve as a third strike, and conviction of a third strike requires a mandatory prison sentence of 25 years to life. In Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003), the Supreme Court held that sending a drug addict who shoplifted three golf clubs to prison for 25 years to life under the three strikes law did not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment.

The chapter for the forthcoming Criminal Law Stories tells the story of the Ewing case, describing Gary Ewing’s life, the crime that became his third strike, and each stage of his case. It describes all of the players and brings to life the oral argument and the Supreme Court’s opinion.

This chapter also explores three questions: First, why did California law impose such a draconian sentence for such a minor offense? The chapter tells the story of the voter initiative that enacted the three strikes laws, the unsuccessful efforts to amend the law, and it describes the way the law has been enforced by California’s elected district attorneys and construed by its courts.

Second, why wasn't such a sentence prohibited by the cruel and unusual punishment clause? The chapter reviews the Supreme Court’s prior Eighth Amendment cases and analyzes the majority and dissenting opinions in Ewing. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the question what limits -- if any -- the Eighth Amendment imposes on the state's authority to replace policies based on rehabilitation, retribution, and individualized sentencing with a policy that seeks to protect society by incapacitating recidivists.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: three strikes, Ewing, criminal law, sentencing

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 30, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Beale, Sara Sun, The Story of Ewing v. California: Three Strikes Laws and the Limits of the Eighth Amendment Proportionality Review (July 28, 2010). CRIMINAL LAW STORIES, Donna Coker, Robert Weisberg, eds., Foundation Press, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650021

Contact Information

Sara Sun Beale (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7091 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,847
Downloads: 253
Download Rank: 71,463
Footnotes:  121

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds