Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650387
 
 

Footnotes (124)



 


 



Participation and Responsiveness in Merits Review of Polycentric Decisions: A Comparison of Development Assessment Appeals


Andrew Edgar


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

July 28, 2010

Environmental and Planning Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 36-52, 2010
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 10/68

Abstract:     
The question of whether tribunals operate in an inquisitorial or adversarial manner can be regarded as a starting point for evaluating their processes. It is a question that is also raised about the Land and Environment Court. In this article I argue that the merits review jurisdiction of the Land and Environment Court generally operates according to an adversarial process. This becomes clear when participation and responsiveness in the Land and Environment Court is compared with the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal's Planning and Environment List which tends to operate according to inquisitorial processes. Particular risks are identified with both adversarial and inquisitorial processes in the context of merits review of development assessment decisions. I argue that the problems raised by adversarial processes are more fundamental than those raised by inquisitorial processes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: merits review, adjudication, inquisitorial process, participation, responsiveness, environmental assessment

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 29, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Edgar, Andrew, Participation and Responsiveness in Merits Review of Polycentric Decisions: A Comparison of Development Assessment Appeals (July 28, 2010). Environmental and Planning Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 36-52, 2010; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 10/68. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650387

Contact Information

Andrew Edgar (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 508
Downloads: 89
Download Rank: 170,633
Footnotes:  124

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds