Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650873
 
 

Footnotes (48)



 


 



The Methodology of Desert


Mary Sigler


Arizona State University - College of Law

July 29, 2010

Arizona State Law Journal, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In a series of books and articles Paul Robinson (along with various coauthors) builds a case for “empirical desert” as a basis for deciding who should be punished under the criminal law and how much. Robinson’s case is unconvincing in several respects. First, his attempt to discredit the leading rival, deontological desert, is based on a misconception of the prevailing methodology in deontological ethics. Additionally, by dismissing as practically irrelevant the grounds for justified punishment, Robinson’s analysis fails to take account of the dynamic interplay between social and political values on the one hand and the meaning and justification of punishment on the other. Finally, because Robinson’s pragmatic conception of desert is untethered from our political morality, it provides neither the occasion to reflect critically on our punitive institutions and practices nor the normative resources to reform them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: punishment, criminal, desert, empirical, deontology, reflective equilibrium

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 2, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Sigler, Mary, The Methodology of Desert (July 29, 2010). Arizona State Law Journal, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650873

Contact Information

Mary Sigler (Contact Author)
Arizona State University - College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 688
Downloads: 117
Download Rank: 139,540
Footnotes:  48

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.234 seconds