Abstract

  
 

Footnotes (26)



 


 



Cracking the Code to Writing Legal Arguments: From IRAC to CRARC to Combinations in Between


Gerald Lebovits


Columbia University - Law School; Fordham University School of Law; New York University School of Law
July 1, 2010

New York State Bar Association Journal, Vol. 82, No. 6, July/August 2010

Abstract:     
This article discusses how to organize the argument section of trial and appellate briefs and discusses the IRARC/CRARC methods as options to IRAC, BaRAC, CIRAC, CRAFADC, CREAC, CRuPAC, FIRAC, FORAC, IDAR, IGPAC, ILAC, IRAAAPC, IREAC, MIRAT, RAFADC, TREACC, and TRRAC.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: leagl writing, IRAC, IRARC, CRARC, BaRAC, CIRAC, CRAFADC, CREAC, CRuPAC, FIRAC, FORAC, IDAR, IGPAC, ILAC, IRAAAPC, IREAC, MIRAT, RAFADC, TREACC, TRRAC

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 2, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Lebovits, Gerald, Cracking the Code to Writing Legal Arguments: From IRAC to CRARC to Combinations in Between (July 1, 2010). New York State Bar Association Journal, Vol. 82, No. 6, July/August 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1650923

Contact Information

Gerald Lebovits (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Gerald_Lebovits
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
HOME PAGE: http://law.fordham.edu/faculty/23484.htm
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,991
Downloads: 946
Download Rank: 10,249
Footnotes:  26

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.516 seconds