ISDA Valuation Cases

Rupert Macey-Dare

University of Oxford - Saint Cross College; Middle Temple; Minerva Chambers

July 31, 2010

Following default under a given ISDA Master Agreement, outstanding derivatives contracts have to be valued in accordance with the applicable provisions for Market Quotation, Loss or Close-out Amount. The interpretation and construction of these clauses is highly complex, in some respects even more complex than the mathematical valuation of the derivatives themselves.

Extremely helpful guidance is however provided by a range of ISDA valuation cases from English and other common law jurisdictions. Their judgments include: β€œANZ v. Societe Generale (2000), North America Steamships Limited (2007), Enron v. Integral (2002), Enron v. Txu (2003), High Risk Opportunities HUB (2005), Peregrine v. Robinson (2000) and Yallourn v. Enron (2005)” and are summarized below.

The key text from each judgment is also carefully identified and set out by topic and sub-topic in this paper and various practitioner test questions included in the Appendix.

Keywords: Master Agreement, Derivative, ISDA

JEL Classification: G12, G13, G15, K22,

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 1, 2010 ; Last revised: January 26, 2011

Suggested Citation

Macey-Dare, Rupert, ISDA Valuation Cases (July 31, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1651621 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1651621

Contact Information

Rupert Macey-Dare (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Saint Cross College ( email )
Saint Giles
United Kingdom
Middle Temple
Middle Temple Lane
London, EC4Y 9AT
United Kingdom
Minerva Chambers
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,811
Downloads: 531
Download Rank: 32,727

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.375 seconds