Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1651908
 
 

Footnotes (202)



 


 



Missed or Foregone Mitigation: Analyzing Claimed Error in Missouri Capital Clemency Cases


Leona Deborah Jochnowitz


State University of New York (SUNY) at Albany - School of Criminal Justice

July 31, 2010

Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 347-427, 2010

Abstract:     
This research is an exploratory study which captures the prevalence of the types and reasons for claims of missed mitigation in 36 of 80 un-reversed Missouri death penalty cases reaching the clemency stage of review from convictions between 1980-1995. Missed mitigation claims raised in clemency cases may be claims of persistent error which undermine the reliability of death penalty sentencing. The research identifies the conditions which might contribute to the prevalence of claimed error. The study concludes that missed mitigation claims are ubiquitous in un-reversed capital cases which have passed all rounds of judicial inspection and have reached clemency. The high prevalence of sentencing error claims shows that structural overhaul of the capital trial may be needed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 83

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 4, 2010 ; Last revised: August 14, 2010

Suggested Citation

Jochnowitz, Leona Deborah, Missed or Foregone Mitigation: Analyzing Claimed Error in Missouri Capital Clemency Cases (July 31, 2010). Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 347-427, 2010 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1651908

Contact Information

Leona Deborah Jochnowitz (Contact Author)
State University of New York (SUNY) at Albany - School of Criminal Justice ( email )
135 Western Avenue
Albany, NY 12222
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 372
Downloads: 34
Footnotes:  202

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds