The Law of Global Space: Rethinking the Legalization of World Politics
M. Patrick Cottrell
Linfield College - Political Science
David M. Trubek
University of Wisconsin Law School
August 3, 2010
Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1124
This paper seeks to broaden received notions of the role of law in world politics. While conventional approaches to legalization conceive of law as regulation and stress compliance with preexisting rules, the paper asserts that especially in the complex arena of transnational governance dubbed “global space,” law often operates very differently. In many cases law-like processes operate more as a framework for collective problem solving in situations of complexity and uncertainty where multiple actors are involved and multiple levels must be coordinated than as a set of fixed rules. Such a normative order looks very different than the conventional model: it may form norms through bottom up participatory processes not by top-down legislation; rely primarily on open-ended rather than precise legal rules; and deploy flexible and revisable standards. Although such features are present in domestic law, they may be more important in global space. Drawing from the “new governance” literature, the paper develops an alternative framework that embraces the full range of law-like processes, paying particular attention to how the communicative, facilitative, and coercive aspects of the law may interact in global space. It conducts a preliminary empirical analysis of the expanded vision of law in global space in three cases – the WTO council and committee system, the EU’s Water Framework Directive, and the Tuna-Dolphin case. While these cases all involve some of the more legalized areas in international affairs, we show that each relies heavily on new governance-type mechanisms to operate.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: Global Governance, International Law, New Governance, Legalization
JEL Classification: K33, K40working papers series
Date posted: August 3, 2010 ; Last revised: August 5, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.390 seconds