Lay Magistrates' Interpretations of ‘Substantial Grounds’ for Denying Bail
Mandeep K. Dhami
University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law
The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 49, Issue 4, pp. 349-360, September 2010
The main goal was to capture how decision makers interpret the phrase ‘substantial grounds’ for denying bail stated in the Bail Act 1976. It was found that magistrates who remanded the defendant into custody, judged the mean risks of the defendant absconding, offending on bail, and obstructing justice to be significantly greater than did those who bailed the defendant. Thus, the mean interpretation of ‘substantial grounds’ across magistrates was from 46% to 51% (on a 0% to 100% scale). However, there was great variability across magistrates. We discuss the implications of the present findings for encouraging consistent, transparent and justifiable interpretations of bail law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Date posted: August 4, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.422 seconds