Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1653076
 
 

Footnotes (169)



 


 



Moving Targets: Placing the Good Faith Doctrine in the Context of Fragmented Policing


Hadar Aviram


University of California, Hastings College of the Law

Jeremy Seymour


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Richard A. Leo


University of San Francisco - School of Law

2010

Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 37, 2010
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2012-08

Abstract:     
The debate sparked by Herring v. United States is a microcosm of the quintessential debate about the scope of the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule and ultimately the appropriate breadth of police authority and constitutional review by courts. Offering a new reading of the decision, this article argues that Herring reflects a healthy dosage of real politic and an acknowledgment that American policing is characterized by a fragmented, localized structure with little overview and control, and much reliance on local agencies. Part I presents the authors’ interpretation of Herring as a case hinging upon the question “who made the mistake?” as the decisive element in establishing good faith. The authors rely on the actual holding of Herring in light of its facts, on the Court’s previous decision in Evans, and on the current circuit split with regard to illegal predicate searches to conclude that a narrow and reasonable reading of the Herring doctrine is appropriate. Part II discusses problematic implications, detailing potential abuses and disincentives of not holding one police agency accountable for the mistakes of another. The authors argue that a “moving target” government party to the criminal process is fundamentally unfair to defendants without proper safeguards. Part III offers a solution: a multivariate analysis of the proper deterrence incentives, which will not only provide protection to the citizen tackling “moving targets,” but also clearer and more detailed guidelines for future decisions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, exclusionary rule, Herring v. United States

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 5, 2010 ; Last revised: October 29, 2012

Suggested Citation

Aviram, Hadar and Seymour, Jeremy and Leo, Richard A., Moving Targets: Placing the Good Faith Doctrine in the Context of Fragmented Policing (2010). Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 37, 2010; Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2012-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1653076

Contact Information

Hadar Aviram (Contact Author)
University of California, Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Jeremy Seymour
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Richard A. Leo
University of San Francisco - School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 717
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 200,282
Footnotes:  169

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds