Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1653351
 
 

Footnotes (175)



 


 



Incoherent and Ineffective: The Concept of Persistent Objector Revisited


Patrick Dumberry


University of Ottawa - Civil Law Section

July 4, 2010

International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 59, pp. 779-802, July 2010

Abstract:     
A rule of customary international law is binding upon all States. One controversial question is whether a State should be permitted not to be bound by such a rule in the event that it objected to it in the early stage of its formation and did so constantly thereafter. This is the theory of the ‘persistent objector’. The present article intends to examine the concept of persistent objector in general international law.

The first part of this article deals with the basic definition of the concept of persistent objector and its conditions of application. We will then examine the reasons why a truly comprehensive theory of persistent objector emerged some 20 years ago in the United States as illustrated by the 1987 edition of the Restatement of the Law by the American Law Institute. The third part of the article intends to analyse the different grounds of criticisms that have been raised against the concept. We will provide readers with our own assessment of the concept. Our survey will show that there is only very weak judicial recognition of the theory of persistent objector and that there is no actual State practice supporting it. The status of persistent objector is in fact ineffective: there are no instances where such a claimed special status actually prevented the application of a rule of customary law to the dissenting State. What is more is the fact that the theory is logically incoherent and that its application is inconsistent.

Ultimately, allowing a State to claim the status of persistent objector represents a fundamental challenge to the very concept of custom in international law. In our view, these findings undermine the existence of a persistent objector status in international law. Finally, this article examines whether or not the concept nevertheless plays any auxiliary role in international relations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Customary International Law, Persistent Objector, State Practice, Custom

JEL Classification: K33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 4, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Dumberry, Patrick, Incoherent and Ineffective: The Concept of Persistent Objector Revisited (July 4, 2010). International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 59, pp. 779-802, July 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1653351

Contact Information

Patrick Dumberry (Contact Author)
University of Ottawa - Civil Law Section ( email )
57 Louis Pasteur Dr
Ottawa
Canada
HOME PAGE: http://www.droitcivil.uottawa.ca/index.php?option=com_contact&task=view&contact_id=148&Itemid=118

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,142
Downloads: 623
Download Rank: 23,223
Footnotes:  175

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.610 seconds