Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1653965
 
 

Footnotes (268)



 


 



Setting Foot on Enemy Ground: Cease-and-Desist Letters, DMCA Notifications, and Personal Jurisdiction in Declaratory Judgment Actions


Marketa Trimble


University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

July 1, 2010

IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 50, p. 777, 2010
UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-42

Abstract:     
In declaratory judgment actions brought by alleged infringers against rights holders, such as actions for declaration of invalidity or non-infringement of intellectual property rights, U.S. courts have long maintained that sending a cease-and-desist letter alone, absent other acts in an alleged infringer's forum, is not a sufficient basis for personal jurisdiction over the rights holder who mailed them to the alleged infringer's forum. Notwithstanding the similarities between cease-and-desist letters and notifications under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided that sending a notification alone does establish a basis for personal jurisdiction over the rights holder.

Contrary to the decision of the Tenth Circuit, this article suggests that cease-and-desist letters and DMCA notifications should be treated similarly. First, as a matter of doctrine, the two instruments are similar enough to warrant application of the same rule. If a letter does not support the exercise of personal jurisdiction in declaratory judgment actions against the rights holder, neither should a notification.

Second, as a matter of policy, maintaining the same approach to the two instruments would promote settlements. The Tenth Circuit's approach defeats this pro-settlement policy because it discourages rights holders from using notifications to achieve a speedy removal of allegedly infringing material from the Internet. To avoid personal jurisdiction in the infringer's forum, rights holders must refrain from using a notification and are thereby deprived of the option to stop further infringements immediately; without such an option they are less likely to seek settlement before filing a lawsuit. It is important to clarify whether notifications will be a basis of personal jurisdiction over a rights holder because the result will determine how practicable the use of notifications will be for rights holders and therefore how effective the notification system will be.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: copyright, personal jurisdiction, declaratory judgment, civil procedure, DMCA

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 6, 2010 ; Last revised: January 31, 2014

Suggested Citation

Trimble, Marketa, Setting Foot on Enemy Ground: Cease-and-Desist Letters, DMCA Notifications, and Personal Jurisdiction in Declaratory Judgment Actions (July 1, 2010). IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 50, p. 777, 2010; UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-42. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1653965

Contact Information

Marketa Trimble (Contact Author)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )
4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 773
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 176,364
Footnotes:  268
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds