The Goldman Sachs Swaps Shop: An Examination of Synthetic Short Selling Through Credit Default Swaps and the Implications of SEC v. Goldman Sachs & Co., et al.
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Pace Law School
August 4, 2010
Chapter Two, The Short Selling Handbook, Elsevier Publishing (2011).
Credit Default Swaps (CDS) are often characterized as insurance, primarily because a buyer typically pays a premium and, in return, receives a sum of money if a negotiated event specified by contract occurs. However, unlike a genuine insurance policy, a “naked” CDS buyer can profit from events which adversely affect an asset to which the CDS buyer has no interest.
Goldman Sachs facilitated a number of controversial and complex structured finance transactions involving domestic residential mortgage instruments, many of which were of subprime credit quality at the zenith of the U.S. real estate “bubble” from 2004-2007. In at least one of these residential-mortgage-backed security (RMBS) deals, Goldman facilitated the short sale of CDS contract referencing a synthetic CDO. Goldman’s client, Paulson & Co., developed a short selling strategy against the “American Dream” in time to profit from the collapse of the domestic residential real estate market.
This article examines the prospect of civil and criminal liability for an investment bank that structured a Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) which referenced RMBS instruments at the behest of a client who sought to short the same instruments synthetically. The prospect of regulatory reform is also considered relative to its expected impact on a bank’s ability to maintain proprietary trading in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives such as those used in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO and related CDS transactions which prompted the filing of civil enforcement litigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and a parallel criminal probe by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3
Keywords: Goldman Sachs, Credit Default Swaps, CDS, Collateralized Debt Obligations, CDO, SEC, DOJ, 10b-5, Paulson & Co., Synthetic Short Selling, TARP, Commodities Futures Modernization Act, Dodd-FrankAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 7, 2010 ; Last revised: June 4, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.500 seconds