Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1657040
 


 



Testing Materiality Under the Unfair Practices Acts: What Information Matters When Collecting Time-Barred Debts?


Nathalie Martin


University of New Mexico - School of Law

Timothy E. Goldsmith


University of New Mexico - Dept. of Psychology

August 2010

Consumer Finance Law Quarterly Report, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Should creditors and debt collectors be required to disclose the fact that a debt is time-barred when attempting to collect from a consumer? This article describes an empirical study that compares how consumers react to two different collection letters, one in which the recipients are told explicitly that the debt being collected is time-barred, and one in which they are not given this information. The study measures whether consumers are equally willing to pay the debt, when they are told that the debt is time-barred. Appended to the article are the survey questions asked of the study participants.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 13, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Martin, Nathalie and Goldsmith, Timothy E., Testing Materiality Under the Unfair Practices Acts: What Information Matters When Collecting Time-Barred Debts? (August 2010). Consumer Finance Law Quarterly Report, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1657040

Contact Information

Nathalie Martin (Contact Author)
University of New Mexico - School of Law ( email )
1117 Stanford, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87131
United States

Timothy E. Goldsmith
University of New Mexico - Dept. of Psychology ( email )
1 University of New Mexico
MSC03 2220
Albuquerque, NM 87131-1161
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,291
Downloads: 213
Download Rank: 82,888

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds