Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1658149
 


 



Aspects of Deconstruction: Refuting Indeterminacy with One Bold Thought


Anthony D'Amato


Northwestern University - School of Law

August 12, 2010

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 113, 1990
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-35

Abstract:     
Deconstruction has already happened on the Supreme Court. Not only can no member of the Court really believe that "the law" (self-invented by the very Court it is supposed to govern!) can constrain the result in any individual case, but its members have also convinced themselves that they have no time to be concerned with dispensing justice to the parties. The justificatory legal language used in judicial opinions is not what our law teachers told us it was. The justificatory legal language is not provided to explain - much less constrain - the result in the case. Rather, it is a mode of couching the personal legislative preferences of unelected judges in the publicly venerated language of a judicial decree.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: judicial opinions, legal determinacy, legal indeterminacy, U.S. Supreme Court

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2010  

Suggested Citation

D'Amato, Anthony, Aspects of Deconstruction: Refuting Indeterminacy with One Bold Thought (August 12, 2010). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 113, 1990; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-35. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1658149

Contact Information

Anthony D'Amato (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 202
Downloads: 19

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds