Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1658590
 
 

Footnotes (679)



 


 



Still a Bad Idea: Military Commissions Under the Obama Administration


David W. Glazier


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

December 13, 2010

Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-32

Abstract:     
Although Senator Obama was critical of the Bush administration’s military commissions, President Obama surprised many observers by reviving the trials. Congress then enacted the Military Commissions Act of 2009, improving their procedural fairness including a categorical ban on statements obtained through torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. The new statute largely quieted previous criticism and support has grown for commission use in preference to federal courts. This article argues that the commissions remain badly, if not fatally, flawed in both procedure and substantive law. The bar against evidence obtained through coercion is ineffective, for example. Prosecutors seem determined to use such evidence, purporting to rely on commission judges as gatekeepers. But the adversarial commission process then shifts the effective burden of keeping the evidence out to the defense, which is substantially impeded by government control of information about interrogations, abuse of classification rules, and lack of good faith discovery. Other procedural issues include the multiple roles allowed the civilian convening authority, denial of defense representation by counsel of choice, and the inequality of resources and access to evidence between prosecution and defense. Issues with the substantive law being applied are even more significant, with serious defects in almost all offenses prosecuted to date. The most common charges, conspiracy and providing material support to terrorism are not recognized violations of the law of armed conflict which would make them prohibited ex post facto enactments. Other offenses have serious problems as applied, being used to prosecute suspected terrorists on the basis of their status as unprivileged belligerents rather than for conduct violating the law of war. These factors may result in commission verdicts being overturned during judicial review; they will surely undermine the trials’ credibility and enhance support for America’s adversaries.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 114

Keywords: Guantánamo, international humanitarian law, law of war, law of armed conflict, military commissions, murder in violation of the law of war, Omar Khadr, spying, terrorism, war crimes

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2010 ; Last revised: December 15, 2010

Suggested Citation

Glazier, David W., Still a Bad Idea: Military Commissions Under the Obama Administration (December 13, 2010). Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-32. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1658590 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1658590

Contact Information

David W. Glazier (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,328
Downloads: 299
Download Rank: 58,316
Footnotes:  679

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.407 seconds